On 15 July, the India-UK FTA came into force. Duties of up to 12% disappeared across 1,143 textile and clothing tariff lines. Both sides of the table now face the same question: what should that 12% actually buy?
CETA — the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (not to be confused with the EU-Canada agreement of the same acronym)
Both sides of the table now face the same question: what should that 12% actually buy? The opening is real — Indian exporters compete in the UK on level terms with Bangladesh, Pakistan and Cambodia for the first time, and British retailers gain cost headroom in a market where it's scarce. But a duty advantage is the most easily competed-away asset in this business. There's a version of the next three seasons where it simply becomes a discount, and nothing else changes for anyone.
Two Sides, Two Pressures
"The 12% is a window, not a strategy."
A More Useful Way to Split It
Rather than splitting the saving by default, split it deliberately — some to price, because the consumer needs it, and some to what both sides need over the next three seasons.
One Practical Note for Both Sides
CETA removed the mandatory customs broker requirement — businesses can register directly with HMRC. But preference under CBIC's Rules of Origin notification (62/2026-Customs N.T.) is documentary and auditable retrospectively. Origin discipline is a joint risk now, not a supplier formality.
The 12% is a window, not a strategy. What gets built inside it decides whether this is a one-season saving or a decade-long sourcing relationship.
Sourcing Under the New FTA?
We help brands and exporters structure the India-UK FTA saving into lead time, traceability and development capability — not just a price cut.
Get in Touch — manish@FlairSource.com